Once upon a time, a long time ago these children orgs were created to protect children and they did quite a good job of it, but nowadays, things are very, very different in deed.
Under the guise of child protection and welfare, these children orgs are now headed and run by heterophobes men haters who support not the traditional family, but in fact single and same sex parenting. In their quest to destroy the traditional family, they are encouraging all heterosexual women from an early age to become promiscuous, using their famous ploy of telling/reminding women they cannot become fully liberated unless they have achieved the freedom to do what they want to do with their bodies and that means sleeping around and having abortion on demand, as part of their "freedom" rights to chose. If this is what women want to achieve to better their lives, then I pity them, for this is the life of the gutter and bringing up children into this kind of environment, saddens me deeply....poor little innocent children.
As for these single mothers known as "breeders" by these heterophobes, are very gullible in deed, for those who chose to needlessly push fathers from their children lives, are in fact assisting these heterophobes not just in the further destruction of what family life they have left, but they are also encouraging the corrupting of their children. The litmus test is very simple in deed, ask yourselves these very relevant questions.
- Why do they always demonise biological fathers for child abuse when factual evidence disproves this?
- Why is it that they always demonise married biological fathers as solely responsible for domestic violence when factual evidence disproves this?
- Why is it that after divorce or separation they do not want to get involved in insuring children are not being denied of their biological fathers unless there is material evidence?
- Why is it that they turn a blind eye to these teenage magazines who are promoting promiscuity as the norm?
- Why is that they stand idly by while our children are corrupted into promiscuity via the school syllabus?
- Why is it that they turn a blind eye to government laws and policies which drives a wedge between children and their parents?
- Why is it that they support families where biological fathers have been replaced by step-fathers and who are most likely to perpetrate child abuse and domestic violence?
- Why is it that they support single and same sex parenting and not the nuclear family, especially the married nuclear family?
If this isn't enough proof, read on....
These are the reports and facts they never wanted you to know.
Fact: These women who have gained positions of power to pursue their own political agendas, are only representative of a very small minority of all women. For sadly, many of the posts in our Child Welfare & Protection organisations, Local Authorities and higher are now filled with heterophobic misandrists [men haters]. These madcap individuals who are more harmful and dangerous to a State than a bunch of terrorists, have managed to gradually squeeze out all the genuine decent Traditional Family oriented women, in their quest to destroy the Family. So therefore, decent woman wise up, this lot are not there for you, they are working against you and your children too.
Of late, a good friend of mine tells me that the NSPCC has been once again doing a lot of advertising on UKTV History [I threw out my TV out years ago], portraying men as the only perpetrators of child abuse; this time round it's either the biological father or the uncle. Also, in some of their literature of late sent through the post, they finally admits the proven fact that it is mum's partners, who in virtually all cases are responsible for child abuse, rather than the biological fathers they have been falsely demonising for decades.
Also from many past and present researches, they are also fully aware that in virtually all cases, child abuse is found within an environment where a 'live alone' mother is committing the abuse or if she happens to be living with a partner who is not the biological father of the child/ren. In the latter kind of environment, the abusers are more often the mothers and their partners, but also the siblings of their partners. View: http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/56703/Mother-faces-starve-murder-charge
I recall quite vividly some five years ago after staging a demo outside the NSPCC London offices, together as a group we asked them as to why they falsely demonise biological father rather than mothers, non-biological partners and their siblings as they should? Their answer was...wait for it! 'If we were to do this, then the amount of money donated would reduce drastically'...that's the NSPCC for you! So I say, do your own research before giving your money to these organisations who's real support is definitely not the Traditional Family, but single and same sex parenting.
These pretend to care for children orgs may have had an honest beginning when they were first created, but today they are definitely not what they portray themselves to be. Every so often they reinvent themselves with some new initiative like the NSPCC "Full Stop" and now we have Barnardos "Silver Spoon" campaign shocking us with pictures of a new-born child with a cockroach in its mouths with the slogan "3 in 1 children are born into poverty".
Some three years ago, I together with a good friend of mine, attended a meeting with Sue Williams who then was 'The Children's Society' head of media marketing & communications. I started the conversation by explaining the purpose of our visit, which was to highlight to her and her organisation, the plight of decent fathers and their children after divorce or a breakdown of a live-in relationship. Her reply was a true indictment of who now runs these children orgs from hell. Her reply was very short and sweet, and this was: "Now the boot is on the other foot", shocked by her misandrist mindless reply, I then told her: "Two wrongs, don't make it right, especially when crucial outcomes of children are at stakes here". It only took us minutes to realise that they too, The Children Society, is now headed and run by a bunch of men haters radical feminists/lesbians who are out to destroy the nuclear family, just like the rest of them.
What I'm prepared to agree with, is this long standing belief of mine that in the last 40 years, there has been a rapid rise in the amount of children born and brought up in poverty. Now ask yourself, why is it that for this same length of time, these so called children orgs have been encouraging and fully supporting single parenting and now also same sex parenting, when there has been endless reports reiterating that in most cases children who come from a caring and loving nuclear family lifestyle, do fair a lot better in every sphere of life, rather than those coming from other lifestyles? There is only one conclusion, and this is that they are there to destroy the family, for according to them it is a bastion of patriarchy, like marriage and the Church.
In fact, in their last revamp of 12/11/03, Barnardos did publish a report called 'Poverty Wrecks Futures' where they have admitted that one of the reason for children poverty in the UK, is family breakdowns, the Traditional Family of course. And what do they do to help, when there is such a breakdown? Nothing, quite the opposite, they just help to give it the killer blow, by turning a blind eye to the child abuse perpetrated by these abusive mothers who are using their children as pawns, all with the consent of Cafcass court reporters and the judiciary from our corrupt family courts, so needlessly disfranchising children from their biological fathers.
They are doing this, not only because they are now mostly funded by those who support other lifestyles and the political correctness brigade, but also because the more chaos they themselves can inflict upon society, the more there will be a need for them to exist and the more funding they will receive, in other words it becomes a job for life for the girls out of the misery that they and their sisters are helping to create. Now, if these organisations happen to be headed by a man [excrement shovelers] , it's definitely not a coincidence, they are only there for public consumption, in other words, so to give the gullible populous at large a sense of credibility, that they are not biased against men/fathers.'
To prove what I'm saying, here is the litmus test. Just ask yourself this other very simple question. If these children orgs really do care about the welfare of children who near all [99%] come from heterosexual families, then why is it that they do not place any pressure whatsoever upon Cafcass and the family courts, to ensure beyond a shadow of a doubt, that not a single child in the UK is ever denied of his/her father without any sound material evidence that the father is a threat to his child/ren?' Better still, why don't you ask them yourself this same question? I bet they won't reply.
